On this Duke Lacrosse business...
In defense of the accuser:
A friend of mine in the media said to me - Come on, what stripper wants to bother with making up stuff. They just want to do their thing, get their money and go. -
and I agree with him completely. The scope of this trial now makes it seem like she's out to extort but how would she have known that her pressing charges would lead to this debacle.
In re. to the defense trying to show that this woman has pressed charges before and is therefore litigious is an expected course of action - but really, why should we be surprised that she has this past? She's a stripper! Of course, there will have been shady dealings in HER past. Why aren't we focusing on how often Duke's Lacrosse players were being chastised by the school? Or the way this case is tarnishing that school's image and dividing a community. To be honest, I don't think her isolated previous charges that were dropped really make her all that litigious. She never went to court, she never got any money. What is more reprehensible to me is the way they are slandering the hell out of this accuser and now her attorney. Funny how these lawyer's claims MAGICALLY wind up in the press every day...hmm, maybe a PR team on your side?
Big money always wins, doesn't it.
If these players are innocent - and hell, they might be, I give them the benefit of the doubt - then slandering the hell out of the opposing side like a nasty political campaign seems like a pretty low blow.
Are their lives ruined? Nah, it's just some bad press for a year or so and then they can go work for daddy or what have you...but the life of this woman will probably be dramatically changed. Why is it that the woman is always attacked when men are accused of rape?